06/20/2008: "PM to release NE Vision 2020By PTI AGALAND Post"

PM to release NE Vision 2020By PTI AGALAND Post

| Kolkata19/06/2008 Prime Minister Manmohan Singh will unveil 'Vision 2020', a document aimed at the socio-economic development of the North-Eastern region, in New Delhi on July 2, Union Minister for Development of North-Eastern region Mani Shankar Aiyar has said. The 'Vision 2020' was prepared after three years of uninterrupted consultations with 50,000 common people of the North East and a host experts and institutions to take care of the shortcomings region Terming the vision document as an 'Aam Aadmi (common man) document', DoNER Minister Mani Shankar Aiyar said it would require Rs 13 trillion for the implementation of Vision 2020 in the region . The document had been endorsed by the North-East Council and Chief Ministers of the region, he told members of the four industry chambers at an interactive session on N-E development, last evening. Aiyar said if India wanted to match the GDP growth of China, then it will have to consider the contribution of the North-East where growth potential was immense. "Much of the requisite investment will have to come from the private sector and the government would have to create the enabling environment for private initiative in economic activities," the vision document said. Aiyar said projects worth Rs 50,000 crore in the road construction sector was awaiting the private sector to tap, across the region.
‘Naga issue is a matter of Sovereignty’ morungexpress
First row (L-R): “Lt col” Kito Mouzar, spokesperson Isak Sumi, “brig” Nikki, “col” Hotoi, “capt” Aheto, “maj” Puchui and “maj” Salem. Top row (L-R): “Maj” K. Maram, “capt” S. Pangmai, “capt” I. Chakas, “capt”James R
Dimapur | June 19 (Morung Express News) : Against the backdrop of the bloody factional violence that have rocked Dimapur over the last few months, resulting in immense casualties on all sides, the “NSCN/GPRN” today hit-out at the rival outfit claiming that the attacks of the NSCN (IM) was not on their boys, but an attack on the Naga unification process.
Elaborating on the genesis of the “unification” process “lt. col.” Kito Monzar said that the move was first initiated “under Isak Swu’s directive and with the consent of SS Khaplang.” There had been no leadership dispute as the “NSCN/GPRN” already recognized a host of leaders in Isak, Muivah, Khaplang and Kitovi among others and it was envisioned that these leaders could live together instead of engaging in factional clashes, he said at a press conference at Vihokhu today.
However, Kito said, that it was “Baba Muivah” who had apposed the unification and tried to break it, resulting in bloodshed. Referring to the casualty the “NSCN/GPRN” sustained, Kito said that they were ‘not afraid as soldiers to die.’ He added that the NSCN (IM) was not attacking them but actually ‘targeting unification.’
The functionaries maintained that the factional clashes were an outcome of the NSCN (IM) offensive. “We are only defending and not attacking” asserted spokesperson Isak Sumi “because unification is not for bloodshed.” He added that the “entire concept of unification is a question of invitation and ‘does not have any ideological differences.’ The entire process is a way to unite the Nagas because every body in Nagaland today wants peace.”
Speaking to the local media at its camp in Vihokhu, the “NSCN/GPRN army” commands in various districts of Nagaland sought to dispel ‘propaganda’ that unification was a movement of the Sumi tribe alone. “Lt. col.” Vedeta from the Chakhesang region accused the rival faction of alleging that unification was a plot of the Sumis to retain land during the initial stage of the move. But after “realizing” that “public support” was “with the NSCN/GPRN,” he claimed, Vedeta said the NSCN (IM) is now alleging that the unification move was for the Sumis. Referring to the controversial Jaluki Zangdi area, Vedeta said that after blaming Sumis of encroaching on the land, they now had “reports that two or three Tangkhul villages have been set up there.”
Also, “brigadier” Nikki during the press conference reiterated that territorial integrity may be possible but that Naga issue was not a matter of integration. It is rather about ‘sovereignty.’ If ‘sovereignty’ was to be achieved, integration would naturally follow, he maintained and accused Muivah of constantly harping on integration while at the same time working towards attainment of “union territory” for Ukhrul, Tamenlong, Chandel and Zeliangrong region.
“The concept of integration has been clearly mentioned in the 16-point agreement,” it was stated.
Nikki emphasized that the casualties sustained by the group had not, in any way affected the morale of the “NSCN/GPRN” since Naga unity must be achieved at any cost, but he said that the significance of the tragedy might be justified by taking it as a time for Nagas to retrospect. “We have no doubt the Naga people should unify and as long as we have the public support we have no doubt that the move is correct,” he said and added that the idea of unification is an integral part to bring about a sense of oneness.
Nevertheless, he said that there was no doubt in the “Naga army” because, he reasoned, the ‘NSCN (IM) were greatly outnumbered, especially in the other districts of Nagaland.’ Even in Manipur state, Nikki said, that ‘the NSCN (IM) breakaway group, UNPC’ and the “NSCN/GPRN” had ‘saturated Tirap and Changlang districts of Arunachal.’ This was ‘now making the rival group’s movement difficult’ it was asserted and added that NSCN (IM) was now concentrated ‘only in Dimapur.’
Referring to the leadership issue, Nikki said it had been decided in the initial stages of the ‘unity process’ that the movement would function under the leadership of the present leaders of the different factions who endorsed unification ‘of Nagas.’ Therefore, when Isak and Muivah ‘backed away from the unification’ while Khaplang and Kitovi supported it, the process naturally came under the leadership of the latter, he said. But he said that this had been misconstrued by some people who propagated that unification had been betrayed by NSCN (K) members. Nevertheless, Nikki declared that there would soon be a shift in the “NSCN/GPRN” leadership since the NNC/FGN (Non-Accordist) group had become their ally.
Nikki also disclosed that the soon after the rainy season the “NSCN/GPRN” camp at Vihokhu would be shifted to the nearby village of Khehoi ‘in observance’ of the Ceasefire Ground Rules that a designated camp should be away from civilian populated areas and at least 12 to 16 kilometers from the national highway.
NSF memo to Rio on NPSC By NPN
| Dimapur19/06/2008 Naga Students' Federation (NSF) has urged chief minister Neiphiu Rio to redress the three-point demand of the Federation relating to Nagaland Public Service Commission (NPSC). NSF vice president Charles Lotha and general secretary Hetoi Chishi in a representation to the chief minister reiterated the demand of the Federation including revamping in the functioning of NPSC and immediate conduct of Combined Technical Examination (CTE) on Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) pattern. The Federation also demanded clarification and rectification from NPSC why it failed to appoint six vacant posts in the Labour & Employment department during the recent declared NPSC results. Reminding of the earlier decision of the NSF to launch agitation against the NPSC starting June 20 if the Federation's demand were not fulfilled, the NSF appealed the chief minister to redress the genuine grievances of the student community with sincerity in the interest of the students community and the Nagas in general.
Naga Army vows to achieve unification at all cost Vihokhu camp to be shifted to Kehoi
DIMAPUR, JUNE 19: The Armed Wing of the NSCN/GPRN has asserted that the morale of Naga Army personnel are very high despite the outfit suffering major reverses at the hands of its rival group in recent times.
On May 16 last, at least 14 NSCN/GPRN cadres from the unification camp were killed in one of the bloodiest factional fight at Seithekima while on June 4 last another 12 NSCN/GPRN cadres were killed by the rival group.
A top Naga Army official, Brigadier Niki Sumi told media persons here at its Vihokhu camp that the Naga Army personnel are ready to lay down their life for the cause of unification of all Nagas.
"So long as Naga public cooperate with us, we are ready to go forward for unification even if more of us are killed," he declared.
Brig Niki also accused rival NSCN (IM) group of being totally against unification in spite of the fact that the unification came about "under the directive of Isak Swu's" and consented to by SS Khaplang.
"Bloodshed unleashed by the NSCN (IM) today is not opposition to our group but is in opposition to Naga unity," he asserted. The Naga Army official, however, claimed that despite the NSCN (IM) going all out to stop Naga unification, the unification movement is slowly gaining grounds. He said in districts like Mokokchung, Mon, Zunheboto and Tuensang the unification process is getting stronger by the day, while Tirap and Changlang under Arunachal Pradesh has come under the unification umbrella. Even many southern Nagas are coming forward in support of unification, he claimed.
Brigadier Sumi also informed that the Vihokhu camp would be shifted to Kehoi village, some few kilometers away from the present Vihokhu camp, after the rainy season. He said this is as per the ceasefire ground rule, which states that a designated camp should be some 12-16 kms away from the highway.
Other top regional authorities and town commands from different parts of Nagaland were present in the press briefing, which was basically called to dispel the doubts in the minds of the general populace that the unification camp is composed of people belonging only to the Sumi community. The Naga army officials also asserted that the present unification process encompasses all Naga community and called upon the public not to be swayed by certain elements attempt to fracture the Naga family further through misinformation campaign. (Page News Service)
‘Insurgency can be solved only through agriculture’ PTI Shillong, June 19 (PTI): Insurgency in Meghalaya can be solved only by development through agriculture and tourism and not by using force, Former Lok Sabha Speaker and Meghalaya State Palnning Board Chairman P A Sangma said on Thursday. People were drawn to insurgency due to unemployment and ideology in the initial stage and use of force by the Centre or deployment of police by the state would not solve the problem, he told a conference on 'Agricultural Development in North East Hill Region: Challenges and Opportunities" organise by Indian Council Agricultural Research (ICAR) at Umiam near here.
He urged for closer ties with Indian Council for Agricultural Research for development of agriculture in Meghalaya and asked ICAR scientists to conduct research in the food habits of the people of the NE, specially in view of the fact that a large number of its people were suffering from cancer. "ICAR should conduct research if consumption of smoked meat, a common practice in the NE, could be a cause of cancer," he said.
Cricitising the erstwhile Congress government in the state for ignoring agriculture he alleged that the minister in charge of it had never approached the Centre for any scheme. Tura MP Agatha Sangma said NGOs should be involved for uplift of agriculture and improving of the environment. In his key note address, former Assam Agriculture University vice-Chancellor D N Borthakur said the region produced very little grains and high yielding varieties of seeds were yet to reach it. In view of problems like soil acidity, lack of infrastructure and awareness, practice of shifting agriculture and recurrent floods in the region stress should be put on horticulture and animal husbandry, he added.

GOVeRNMENT OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF NAGALIM
Ministry of Information & Publicity
Press Release 19th June'08

The Ministry of Chaplee, Government of the People's Republic of Nagalim, GPRN issued order for the Cancellation of all the "Authorization Permit" within Nagalim with immediate effect until further order. Henceforth, the collections will be directly dealt by the Chaplee Ministry. The Cancellation order issued under K. Among, Secretary, Ministry of Chaplee, GPRN.

Issued by: MIP/GPRN

On 2nd Naga reconciliation meet in Thailand
The Naga National Council and the Federal Government of Nagaland is the parent body of Naga nation and it has been safeguarding the solidarity of Naga people all the times from the inception of the NNC/FGN. The NNC/FGN therefore feels that it is unnecessary to attend the reconciliation meet by the parent body. Hence the NNC/FGN did not send its representative to attend in the first meet and also will not send in the second meet as well. But let the sectarian leaders decide to reunite with the parent body through such reconciliation meet. We appreciate the Quaker group and Baptist World Alliance for taking their sincere initiative to bring the Nagas united and we hope that they will certainly give a good medicine to heel bloodshed in Nagaland.
We however feel that it is better to hold such meeting in our homeland instead of holding in a foreign land. It is a shame on our part that holding such meeting in a foreign country and continued more killings in our homeland after the meet. The sectarian leaders made none existence accord as an issue and used it for their political propagandas and on the other hand all of them are involving in the Indian elections. According to today's Paper; one of the sectarian leaders who released from the Indian Jail on May 8, 1976 through the Shillong Accord accepted the Indian rehabilitation and now denouncing the Accord, suggested to form anew faction ¡Naga national unity government.¢ If it is so, another new faction will be born from Chiangmai reconciliation meet in this year 2008. Last year 2007, a new faction was born in the name of re-unification and more killings among the Nagas are taking place in Dimapur areas.
From the 1950s, the Indian leaders attempted to nullify the Plebiscite of 1951 and they conceived the idea to organize Naga leaders whose idea deferred from the NNC President A.Z. Phizo. As a result the so-called revolutionary government and NSCN were formed one after another. And since 1990, the intention of the Indian leaders was to convince the flexible Naga leaders in the name of NNC and solve the Indo-Naga conflict within the armpit of the Indian Constitution. As a result some of the educated Nagas made themselves as the so-called non-accordist NNC in 1990 and non-accordist FGN in 2005. They are denouncing and opposing veteran leaders who firmly stand to safeguard the sovereignty of Nagaland dedicating their whole loves. So it is possible to bear another new faction from Chiangmai meet and create more problems among the Nagas, if the meet does not deal scrupulously.
In stead, it is better to realize and choose the right path to do good for the Nagas by the sectarian leaders. And we must in unison praise God our Lord who is leading our nation from the beginning to this day and also let us thank Him for He has saved our nation from the doom and brought peace in Nagaland.
Gaibon Panmei, Dy. Rali-Wali Kilonser, Federal Government of Nagaland.
NSCN(IM) belittles common struggle proposition-I Newmai News Network
Dimapur, June 20: Countering to the earlier statement of the UNLF, the NSCN-IM on Friday said that every revolutionary group in the region is born out of its own conviction in the history of its political existence as a part of the world political set-up. The outfit added that unfortunately, the different revolu- tionary groups never stand on the same footing for reason of history.
"Therefore, the question of uniqueness will bear its own meaning in due course of time when the reckoning moment comes as in the case of the Nagas, which was legitimately gi-ven recognition by the Go- vernment of India and the world at large is also falling in line. Because NSCN has been the torch `bearer of the Naga's political struggle on the strength of its historical rights and not just by raising slogans," claimed the NSCN-IM statement.
The outfit further stated that in the context of one's historical claim it is wise to establish its own political legitimacy in the spirit that carried the revolutionary movement. Fraternal concern is certainly a part of the revolutionary movement in the region. However, the UNLF's proposition on the common struggle holds very little value from the Naga's perspective, said the NSCN-IM while adding, "Because the basis of the struggle are different and therefore, the approach also has to be taken care of in different level. Otherwise, the- re is no reason why the NSCN should treat the UNLF in such allergic manner".
"To put the matter stra-ight NSCN never under- mi- nes the revolutionary aspiration of the neighbours, be it the Meiteis or the Assa-mese. The merit of each case will justify their claims. Naga's case is a matter of subjugated nation. Because Nagas was never a part of Indian Union by conquest or by accession. Na- gas are victims of aggression by India. The Meiteis join the Indian Union in 1949. Therefore, sedition case being applied may hang heavily on the Meiteis when they went too far. Nevertheless, NSCN shall always respect the will of the poeple. Because, the people are the wheel of the revolution and any struggle sans people's involvement is not going to succeed," said the outfit.
The outfit also said that the Meities or the Assame-se political ambitions are their own business, and in the same manner, the NSCN -IM's political ambition will be decided and achieved by virtue of its own merit and tenacity.
The NSCN-IM however encouraged that moral support from each other should not be found lacking and unwarranted hindrance be done away with, giving due respect to the historical validity of the case in the picture. "In the political milieu of revolution, right and might stands on different interpretation. Nagas were able to take the Naga issue this far because of the inherent right attached with the movement. Might is a mere symbolic. NSCN would be willing to extend any cooperation but not at the cost of its rights," said the outfit.
The NSCN-IM then pointed out that the painful reality before the Nagas is the unacceptability of the UNLF's political vision that is full of contradictions. "The historical incidents of the UNLF with its highly vocal campaign against the Nagas, taking up the Kuki's case even at international forums without exercising the political insight and maturity is a matter of serious bitterness for the NSCN and Nagas. But in return the UNLF's Chairman Sana-yaima Raj Kumar was made to bite the dust when he was rebuked and asked to leave the UN Sub-Commission for Human Rights in 1994 in Geneva. The UN platform being used by Sanayaima to launch a smear campaign against NSCN by raising Naga-Kuki ethnic clash, implicating the NSCN rather than open its own historical account was treated with disdain by the UN authorities.
This leaves a dark shadow in the UNLF-NSCN relationship," alleged the NSCN-IM.
NSCN AGAINST UNLF'S POLITICAL VISION
Every revolutionary group in the region is born out of its own conviction in the history of its political existence as a part of the world political set-up. Unfortunately, the different revolutionary groups never stand on the same footing for reason of history. Therefore, the question of uniqueness will bear its own meaning in due course of time when the reckoning moment comes as in the case of the Nagas, which was legitimately given recognition by the government of India and the world at large is also the falling in line. Because NSCN has been the torch `bearer of the Naga's political struggle on the strength of its historical rights and not just by raising slogans.
In the context of one's historical claim it is wise to establish its own political legitimacy in the spirit that carried the revolutionary movement. Fraternal concern is certainly a part of the revolutionary movement in the region. However, the UNLF's proposition on the common struggle holds very little value from the Naga's perspective. Because the basis of the struggle are different and therefore, the approach also has to be taken care of in different level. Otherwise, there is no reason why the NSCN should treat the UNLF in such allergic manner. To put the matter straight NSCN never undermine the revolutionary aspiration of the neighbors, be it the Meiteis or the Assamese. The merit of each case will justify their claims. Naga's case is a matter of subjugated nation. Because Nagas was never a part of Indian Union by conquest or by accession. Nagas are victims of aggression by India. The Meiteis join the Indian Union in 1949. Therefore, sedition case being applied may hang heavily on the Meiteis when they went too far. Nevertheless, NSCN shall always respect the will of the poeple. Because, the people are the wheel of the revolution and any struggle sans people's involvement is not going to succeed. The Meities or the Assamese political ambitions are their own business, and in the same manner, the NSCN's political ambition will be decided and achieved by virtue of its own merit and tenacity. Moral support from each other should not be found lacking and unwarranted hindrance be done away with, giving due respect to the historical validity of the case in the picture. In the political milieu of revolution, right and might stands on different interpretation. Nagas were able to take the Naga issue this far because of the inherent right attached with the movement. Might is a mere symbolic. NSCN would be willing to extend any cooperation but not at the cost of its rights.
The painful reality before the Nagas is the unacceptability of the UNLF's political vision that is full of contradictions. The historical incidents of the UNLF with its highly vocal campaign against the Nagas, taking up the Kuki's case even at international forums without exercising the political insight and maturity is a matter of serious bitterness for the NSCN and Nagas. But in return the UNLF's Chairman Sanayaima Raj Kumar was made to bite the dust when he was rebuked and asked to leave the UN Sub-Commission for Human Rights in 1994 in Geneva. The UN platform being used by Sanayaima to launch a smear campaign against NSCN by raising Naga-Kuki ethnic clash, implicating the NSCN rather than open its own historical account was treated with disdain by the UN authorities. This leaves a dark shadow in the UNLF-NSCN relationship.
UNLF talked of common enemy but feigned ignorance of the Kukis once used by the common enemy to fight against the Nagas which eventually set off the ethnic war. In the same fashion, the UNLF is finding pleasure to rake up the Naga-Kuki ethnic clash when it talked of common struggle. This is derogatory of UNLF's stand. Is this an example of revolutionary sincerity? What is common goal or common struggle when there is no revolutionary credibility and honesty? Pretension is not the trait of honest revolutionary movement. A risky affair it will turn out to be when blindly taking the plunge.
All said and done, NSCN never believe in force union or force marriage. For obvious reasons the alienation of the Naga people from such theoretical concept is unquestionable. Under the present scheme of things, to indulge in such idealism is the remote option for the Nagas. The UNLF should think of some basic changeover of its socio-political outlook before it comes out with such overtures to the NSCN on the issue of common struggle

Issued by: MIP/GPRN

WHO CARES IF YOU DON'T CARE FOR YOUR FREEDOM
AN APPEAL FOR PRAYER FOR NAGA FREEDOM Rev. Seksim Kasar

When no one cared for the Nagas, heaven came down to their rescue. The scattered and lost people of this mountainous country were found and brought home together by the power of Gospel. They were thus given enlightenment and made a privileged group more than any other surrounding ethnic groups that they be God's witnesses. In the 20th century, the Nagas were put in the forefront for the sake of heavenly grace. God has special purpose for the Nagas but do Nagas care for their heavenly call with extraordinary privilege? Let us intently look into our history and offer our sincerest prayer to God, the father of all humankind.
When the British were to relinquish their empire from South Asian Regions, God worked in the hearts of some British Officers for Nagas'future. Consequently, in 1946, the British proposed "Coupland Plan" in which they offered the Nagas to stay in "British Crown Colony" or "British Trust." But, sad to say, history said, feckless Naga salaried men (job holders) rejected the offer. For they love money and job more than Nagas' freedom.
Later, in 1947, February 17, it was said that the NNC submitted a memorandum to "His Majesty's Government in London and the British India Government in Delhi for an interim government for a period of Ten Years." But it was too late when it came on the table. Everything was set ready for handing over to India on August 14.
According to A.Z. Phizo, India also offered "Bhutan Status" but that was also rejected by the Nagas without giving any contemplation. Consequently Naga problem remained unsettled while Bhutan, Nepal and Ceylon were conceded freedom. Then, India also agreed to settle the Indo-Naga political conflict on the basis of Suisa's proposal. It was a ten year agreement, and at the end of ten years, decision was to be made for final settlement, whether to join the Union of India or to be FREE. But that was also rejected by the Nagas with a shout of nothing short of absolute sovereignty all at once.
Why let go all such fine opportunities! Nagas did not know what was best for them at any given time but perhaps God knows the best always. But regrettably, in sixty years of conflict, we have suffered miseries and lost of lives and properties. Were these be what the cantankerous Nagas asking for? May not be.
If God's grace is still available and heaven's care is still for us, we need not to be disappointed. Yes, God who has been leading us through all these turbulent years will also not abandon us in half way. Sixty years of his leading is evidence of God's unchanging love. To Him, let us fix our eyes, believing in his faithfulness.

Nagas' entry in UN bodies, would this be God's sign of love for the Nagas once again?
1. In the early 1990s, Nagas were given platform in the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), UN Commission on Human Rights, UN Sub-Committee on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities. Base on Resolution no 296 (XLVI) of ECOSOC, the UNO, signed by its Secretary General, Boutros Boutros Ghali declared "there is human rights situation in Nagaland."
2. In 1993, February 23, Nagas were admitted as a member nation in the UNPO, a world body of nations.
3. In 2005, May 11, the PNSD again accepted the Nagas as a legitimate member nation suppressed by India.
4. The Well-known International bodies like KWIA in Belgium, Society for Threaten Peoples in Germany, Association of American Minorities USA, Naga International Support Group in Amsterdam, The Quakers International, etc. are all out in favor and support of the Indo-Naga Peace Process up till now.

In the Home front, India has already recognized Nagas' Unique history and situation and therefore, separate Entity. On this strong political ground, talks is being carried forward without any pre condition, at the highest level and anywhere in the world. But, in spite giving honest effort, India is buying time and keeping on playing her cards just like that of Balaam's card that defiled and almost destroyed the Israelites. Would Nagas succumb to this trap or come out triumphantly by accepting each other is the most important concern now for every living soul in Nagalim.

Therefore, taking into consideration of God's unmatched love for us, let us humble ourselves before Him, confess our sins in repentance and be reconciled. Perhaps He may intervene in an extraordinary way and bring healings to our land and heals our wounds. He will surely be gracious to us. Let us keep on praying, remembering how the Israelites did so in ancient time.

"Come, let us return to the LORD.
For He has torn us, but He will heal us;
He has wounded us, but He will bandage us.
2 "He will revive us after two days;
He will raise us up on the third day
That we may live before Him.
3 "So let us know, let us press on to know the LORD.
His going forth is as certain as the dawn;
And He will come to us like the rain,
Like the spring rain watering the earth."
(Hos 6:1-3 NAS)

Issued by: Rev. Seksim Kasar (Through MIP/GPRN)

Press Release 20th June'08

A Thought For ENPO

As per the invitation of ENPO, we the members of ENNWU had attended tteh Tuensang meeting on 18th Dec'07 along with ENNWU and FGN workers. We were made to agree on the regulation passed by the ENPO where in it was stated that no bloodshed be in the jurisdiction of the districts i.e. Tuensang, Mon, Longleng and Kiphiri since that day. It was also stated that which faction so ever violate the regulation, public will not cooperate or support that faction.
Among many other activities, the K group had killed Mr. Chemeng Chang and Lemba Chang at Tobu on 16th March'08. Again Dy. Kilonser Alem's house was raided at Tizit and took away properties. again on the night of 19th June'08 Mr. Chingngak Konyak was shot and injured at his hand at Naganimera. Seeing all this things we as human being have our memory to ask that people of ENPO in general and ENPO office bearers in particular to bar that organization in accordance with your resolution.

Issued by: Dr. SHONBA CHANG Convenor, ENNWU, NSCN.
Naga Mind Must Match Naga Goal Nagarealm.com
It has always been politically correct to talk “reconciliation”, “peace” and “unity” in the Naga context. What is different this time is that more Naga people are talking about them more loudly than ever before. The big question is whether the time is ripening enough for reconciliation to take place and effect a final acceptable and workable solution of the Naga Issue.

The biggest enemy of reconciliation and a final solution to the Naga Issue, especially since the early 1980s, has been the inability of Naga factional leaders to accommodate each other – in the late 1950s and 1960s, it was more about Overground and Underground division and how to bring them together. While everyone aspired for the best for Naga society, most factional leaders also wanted reconciliation and solution according to their terms, with only themselves sitting at the negotiation table. This has frequently led to removing fellow ideological comrades across the factional divide, including assassinating and eliminating them, even while ‘shaking hands’ with ideological enemies, for short-term gains. How contradictory and self-defeating such thinking and actions have been has never been discussed in Naga Society as everyone was fearful of everyone else. It became a case where most Nagas were talking freedom in fear!

What could be some of the hurdles Nagas have collectively experienced in their recent past history and which still stand in the way?

i) In the name of culture and traditions, the level of Naga thinking failed to rise much beyond our tribes and ‘village republics’. Partly this was because our people didn’t know any better and they represent the only fall-back option. And because our ‘identity’ is so closely bonded with them, few would dare to stray from the beaten path; those who tried to do so either got lost or their ideas were usually discounted within their own tribe communities – “This is not our/Naga culture” is usually reason enough to close arguments and, by default, to discourage new thinking within tribe communities. While there is much wisdom and security to be found in the tribe traditions and culture, these sometimes became “comfort zones” which prevented our people from further growth and breaking new paths to the future. The negative aspects of our practice of tribalism are a ready example.

ii) In the backdrop of recent Naga political history, especially where it concerns the bonding and cementing of our different tribes into a people, there has been very little tolerance and accommodation of one another. Admittedly, Naga Nationalism launched Naga Peoplehood. But soon, Naga Nationalism also became the primary cause of tearing asunder the fabric of the emerging Naga Peoplehood. Naga Nationalism was a right and bold initiative as a response to the demands of the time. It needed to be matched with equally bold and imaginative thinking. This failed because our people failed to adequately appreciate the fact that we had taken upon ourselves the task of attempting to accelerate the process of change and moving the Naga people into the future. Our thinking failed to match our stated goal. While talking Naga freedom and sovereignty, our thinking and actions have always been moved by tribe and community value systems and considerations. So far, it has resulted in Naga failure to give themselves a fair chance to make their peoplehood work.

iii) After so many decades of relentless violence in society, and with no assessment of such possible impacts on society by Nagas, the Naga people, apparently, are unable to move forward. Reconstruction and Rehabilitation, two vital areas that could tremendously help the Nagas and Naga society, are tragically considered by Nagas only from an economic/developmental angle. Without an adequate and objective understanding/appreciation of the impacts of prolonged/entrenched violence on communities and society, healing, reconciliation and restoration are made more difficult. Unity and Peace can only be the ‘fruits’!

There are, however, certain signs of hope in recent times despite continued and even escalating violence and killings between factions. One says this with some trepidation but considering the trends rather than actual happenings which are gloomy. So, what could these signs of hope be?

i) Talks of Reconciliation, Unity and Peace have become louder with the public, apparently, no more throttled by the numbing “fear psychosis” that was normal just a few years ago. The Naga public is now beginning to speak out its mind openly and acting according to their conscience, including “chasing” the violent factional elements from their areas. This is not to say that the Naga public, per se, should oppose the factions. The point is since the factions claim to represent the Naga people and to be fighting for Naga nationalism, they ought to listen to the people who, in turn, should voice their opinions and act without fear or favour and in the interest of the collective welfare of all the Nagas. The chief minister has also announced his own resolve to forgive those who had tried to snuff out his life pre-maturely.

ii) There are signs of Naga intellectuals and church leaders giving their determined focus on the subject of Reconciliation. One of the most complete and satisfying treatise on Reconciliation, in the Naga context, was given by Dr Wati Aier at the recent Naga Hoho general session at Peren, on May 30, titled, “A Campaign for a Common Voice Among the Nagas”. The press is often accused of sensationalism and selective indignation. Dr Aier’s paper talks about the Church’s general “selective … and biased morality” and “structural and institutionalized sins” which are destroying the Nagas. He also comes down heavily on Naga political of various hues who would quite happily interprete the Bible (St Paul’s Messages) according to what is convenient to them! Reconciliation does not mean Compromise or having to submit to the will of powerful, rich or even majority view – there would be no healing then. The paper deserves to be studied and deliberated upon at various fora of the Naga public. As a start, various church bodies ought to create opportunities/platforms for such discussion – if not this (healing, restoration and salvation) what is the role of the Churches in Nagaland?! One would like to suggest that those committed to Reconciliation may, with permission, even print the paper and give it out to people to read and reflect upon – at least the church bodies could do this and distribute to students in educational institutions. When a settlement comes, as come it must, reconciliation, or at least forgiveness, will be needed for it to work – even if this only means Nagas arriving at Ground Level Zero, hopefully, on a clean slate!

iii) It is heartening to read in the newspapers that the Overground politicians, in the form of the State Government’s Peace Affairs Committee (PAC), have begun meeting with the Underground factions and that the PAC has a programme to meet with all the factions. What this means is as yet too not clear. But one would like to read the best interpretation and take it to mean the beginning of bridging of the ideological divide in Naga Society following the 16-Point Agreement of 1960. The PAC’s task is unenviable as they have to not only cross their own ideological divide but also try to bring the warring factions to the negotiable table with themselves and further “facilitating” or creating agreeable conditions for settlement of the Naga Issue with the Government of India – How these will all work out is not clear unless Naga emotions, and ideological compromises, will help pave the way! What will further exasperate the efforts of the PAC, because it will be the most difficult, will be to bring all the factions to the negotiation table for without it the only result can be another Shillong Accord, with possible worse consequences. Even more, the PAC/State Government, and those interested in finding a settlement of the Naga Issue, will have to reach out to our neighbours in the NE for without this the Naga Issue cannot be settled to Naga satisfaction. The PAC, and Nagaland Government, will require much prayer support!

Ultimately, it will all come back to reconciliation, healing and a mindset that will match the goal of Naga Peoplehood, as opposed to Naga Nationalism and Sovereignty. Naga peoplehood belongs to all Nagas. All Nagas must have a say in their collective future. Neither can anyone usher in the Future when such efforts are still dictated by the Past! Trying to do the impossible can only hurt oneself and complicate our situation in the long run, as indeed it has already. What is required, from all indications, is for each tribe and Nagas as a whole to work out an adequate framework of our peoplehood, late as it is. Only then Nagas may begin to build a proper ‘working’ society for themselves! [Charles Chasie, KOL]

Clash between KRA and KNA Villagers reduced to refugees status
By Our Staff Reporter Sangai Express

Women and children at the refugee camp
IMPHAL, Jun 20: The hardships being faced by the innocent civilians due to clash between UG groups continue as nearly 500 villagers of Waakan area of Sadar Hills (Senapati district) under Saikul Police station had fled from their respective homes and are taking shelter at nearby Purum Likli and Champhai villages since June 16 as nearly 200 cadres of KRA and KNA have taken up positions indicating a looming fierce gunbattle.
Nearly 250 villagers including women and children of Maibung Likli and Wakonphai villages are taking refuge at eight 'worm rearing sheds' of Sericulture Department at Purum Likli, while around same number of villagers from Waakan, Khokon, L Songphel and H Molnoi villages are taking shelter at various houses of Champhai village.
According to Purum Likli Church secretary K Ningthou, Government has not extended any help despite the fact that the SDO Saikul had witnessed the helplessness of these villagers during his visit to the relief camp some days back. He however conveyed that a medical team accompanied the SDO when he visited the camp. Kuki Inpi, KSO Saikul, Komrem Union and KKL come to the camp regularly with relief materials, Ningthou added.
Ningthou conveyed that the main concern in the camp is seasonal diseases and foodstuff. A pregnant woman from the camp was hospitalised at PHC Sagolmang for delivery, while some children are sufering from diarrhoea, he said and added that it may spread to other villagers if adequate medical aid is not provided soon.
Purum Likli chief Rinneichuong Chongthu appealed to the UG groups concerned to end their standoff so that the villagers may return to their respective homes soon as the sowing season for the year has already begun. If they do not sow the paddy in time, the villagers would be in trouble, he added.
This reporter could witness villagers sleeping on the floor using plastic sheets and cement bags instead of mattress. They were also not having mosquito nets and blankets. A villager said that 40 campers have to stay in the 40x23 ft worm rearing shed.
Narrating the clash between KNA and KRA, a villager who is one of the 250 villagers taking refuge at the shed at Purum Likli told The Sangai Express that around 100 cadres of KRA arrived early morning of June 16 from the Molkon side to disperse around the same number of KNA cadres who had taken control of Waakan area since the past four/five years. It might also be a revenge ploy by the KRA after the KNA launched a massive attack some days back at Molkon area, which is known to be a stronghold of KRA, he speculated.
Meanwhile, a team of United Committee Manipur headed by its president Konsam Langamba visited the relief camps today.
The team extended help with six and four bags of rice (50 kg each bag) to the camps at Purum Likli and Champhai village respectively. The team also donated Rs 500 to the relief camp of Purum Likli.
Speaking to the villagers, Langamba said that UCM would try its best to press the Government to do the needful for the villagers. He also appealed to the UG groups to end the clash that has severely affected the villagers.
It may be mentioned that two KNA and one KRA cadres were on June 9 during a clash at Molkon area, while a civilian was killed on June 13 as he was hit by stray bullets during a clash at Saikul area.
Activating process of Heirok SPOs starts First batch head for 1 month training at Pangei By Our Staff Reporter Sangai Express
IMPHAL, Jun 20 : Out of 300 SPOs selected from Heirok, 175 personnel have headed to Manipur Police Training Centre, Pangei for arms training. Thoubal District Police made the whole arrangement for transportation of the SPOs from Heirok to Pangei today.
Thoubal District Police made a publicity campaign this morning at Heirok asking the selected SPOs to assemble at the IRB post located at Heirok Part II. To the publicity campaign of the Thoubal District Police, many selected SPOs responded and came to the IRB post but there were many other selected SPOs who refused to come out.
On the other hand, there were some people who lined up the road and cheered the SPOs when they came out with their beddings, bags and trunks for arms training at Pangei. The SPOs were then taken to Pangei in eight buses amidst police escorts.
The remaining SPOs who refused to come out today would be taken to Pangei after asking them to report at the Heirok Part II IRB post tomorrow morning.
Interacting with media persons, some people of Heirok said that Assam Rifles troops, BSF personnel, IRB and commando personnel have been patrolling the limits of Heirok in the night time following restrictions imposed by the proscribed UNLF and KYKL upon the movement of Heirok people in the aftermath of the establishment of SPOs.
Before the Government came up with the initiative to set up SPOs in response to the demand of Heirok people for guns for self-defence, Meira Paibis used to keep vigil in Heirok localities at night, they conveyed.
Disclosing that the movement of Heirok people have been severely curtailed, they informed that sometimes commandos provided security escorts to some Heirok people while going to neighbouring Wangjing. Moreover, 12 passengers which earlier plied along Imphal-Heirok route has also suspended their service. If any villager wish-es to travel to Imphal, he or she must go to Wangjing first in an auto-rickshaw before he/she boards a bus there for Imphal. Meanwhile, a public meeting was held today at Heirok Umang Laikol on the unfolding situation in the locality.
Change of guard in Burmese junta Mizzima News

New Delhi - In a change of guard, Burma's secretive military rulers have carried out a major reshuffle in the cabinet and in key positions held by its military commanders.

While the junta officially announced the reshuffle of its cabinet ministers, the change of guard in its military command and Bureau of Special Operations was not disclosed, as usual.

The junta's state-run radio and television on Friday announced that Major General Maung Maung Swe, who earlier held two posts, has been left with just one - Minister for handling Post-Cyclone Management, Resettlement. One of his earlier portfolios, Minister for Immigration and Population, was given to Maj. Gen. Saw Lwin. Saw Lwin's earlier post, Minister of Industries (2), has been given to Commander-in-Chief of the Navy, Vice Admiral Soe Thein, a move viewed by observers as shunting him from power.

Meanwhile, the Burmese junta not surprisingly made several other changes among its military commanders, including promoting younger officers to commanders and pushing effective commanders into higher ranks. This, however, was not announced.

Sources in the military establishment said the junta has ordered the transfer of four of its key military commanders to positions at the Bureau of Special Operations (BSO). The four commanders - Maj Gen Aung Than Htut, Commander of the Northeastern Military Command, Maj Gen Ohn Myint Commander of Northern Military Command, Maj Gen Min Aung Hlaing, and Maj Gen. Ko Ko Commander of Southern Military Command – were transferred to positions in the Bureau of Special Operations.

According to the source, among the retiring BSO officers are seniors like Junta's Joint Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces Gen. Thura Shwe Mann, who is number three in the junta's hierarchy. The source said it was inconvenient for Shwe Mann to give orders to BSO officers, as they were senior to him.

Burma's military establishment has a total of five officers in its BSO. While Maj Gen Maung Bo, one of the five BSO officers was spared, the other four – Maj. Gen. Ye Myint, Maj. Gen. Aung Htwe, Maj. Gen. Kyaw Win, and Maj Gen. Khin Maung Thann - were made to retire, in order to make way for the newly transferred officers.

Sources said Brig. Gen. Kyaw Phyo, Commandant of General Staff College in Kalaw was promoted to Commander of Triangle Command, Brig. Gen. Yar Pyae, former Defence Services Medical Academy (DSMA) to Commandant of Eastern Command Commander, and Brig. Gen. Hla Min of the LID 11 has been promoted to Commander of Southern Command.

While Brig. Gen Soe Win commandant of General Staff College in Than Daung has been promoted to Northern Command Commander, Brig. Gen Win Myint of the Light Infantry Division (LID) 77 was promoted as Commander of Strategic Command, Rangoon Division, which is crucial for maintaining power. The junta also switched two of its commanders' posts. Brig. Gen. Thaung Aye was transferred from Eastern to Western Command, while Brig. Gen. Maung Shein from Western to Northeastern Command.

Meanwhile, the junta also transferred Rangoon Commander Maj. Gen. Hla Htay Win to Chief Military Training, a post held by Lt. Gen Aung Htwe, who will now retire, sources said.

"Almost all commanders have been reshuffled, the only two who are not transferred are [Snr. Gen.] Than Shwe and [Vice Snr. Gen.] Maung Aye," the source in the military establishment said.

Nagalim.NL News

06/20/2008: "PM to release NE Vision 2020By PTI AGALAND Post"